100D/SL1 is not that small

Started Mar 21, 2013 | Discussions thread
EvokeEmotion Contributing Member • Posts: 998
Re: 100D/SL1 is not that small

123Mike wrote:

Why would smaller be better? Without a proper grip on the right, the darn thing is going to fall out of your hands. The new ones seem very clumsy to me. Also, Canon's marketing always starts with "world's smallest". What are they trying to, compete with P&S cameras? Compete with NEXs (as if)?

+1. I tried to like the Rebel series, specifically the XSi, but with my pinky gripping air everytime I held that camera, it was uncomfortable to use. If I get this new addition, I guess not just my pinky, but my ring finger would also be holding on to nothing. And I'm don't even have very big hands.

 EvokeEmotion's gear list:EvokeEmotion's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS M Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM +8 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow