DxOMark's measured ISOs vs. manufacturer ISOs

Started Mar 13, 2013 | Discussions thread
olliess Senior Member • Posts: 1,349
Re: DxOMark's measured ISOs vs. manufacturer ISOs

texinwien wrote:

olliess wrote:

...From the EXIF data it looks as if both shots were taken with the same 50 mm Olympus lens at f/6.3, but the OM-D shot was exposed at 1/800 while the G3 shot was exposed at 1/1300, which is about +2/3 stops more exposure for the OM-D. This would agree with the subjective differences in brightness (and suggest that you would need to dial in +2/3 stop on the G3 to make the shutter speeds match). But what good is this as a "comparison" of images at fixed ISO, e.g., 3200?

Although you would think that to be the case, DPReview has addressed this in great detail and with absolute certainty - the EXIFs on these shots cannot be used to determine relative exposure levels, due to DPReview's testing regime.

So what can we determine from this comparison, if anything?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
tko
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow