Olympus C-3000 Zoom review
Bought this camera in 2001. It performed good quality sharp images. I
used the camera for pictures wich I had printed in brochures and
magazines. This was a succes when I did not enlarge more than to A4.
At that time I payed over $1200 fot this camera. I used an external
flash with a connecting-cable. This was also an expensive attribute, but
so I could avoid red eyes and used bounce-flash.
Since one year I have a Canon G5 of wich I think it has more
possibilities, but at that time The Olympus C-3000 was the best digital
compact one could get.
Skin tones are not so well performed: people look like wax images
(Madame Tussaud) buttons are rather small and do not have
Batteries are empty soon. You should always take a spare set.
External flash only with expensive connecting-cable
Lost lens cap after two weeks.
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Flower in flower by atdigit|
from Random Items Challenge 26
|Surface tension by atdigit|
from Right in the middle
|A Normal Dat at Thomas's Clap 2016-9379 by Andrew Maltzoff|
from Show us SCHOOL!