Sony Mavica FD-95 review
I have used my FD-95 since I first bought it. Not sure of the year, but it was soon after they first became available.
I LOVE this camera. Although it is a little bulky, I don't really mind because it LOOKS like a much more expensive camera (I paid just in excess of $2000, including taxes, here in Canada).
However even though by today's standards, it has a very low megapixel rating, I am able to take the most fabulous pictures with it.
You can see some of them at my photo website: pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bfstarling/my_photos
This camera gives me incredible pictures all the time....the macro setting has enabled me to see individual grains of pollen in flowers and the legs of a fly.
I think if the CD version of the camera had been available at the time I bought, I would have got one of those. But with a 64mb card and a disk carrier for the camera, it suits my purpose very, very well.
I have never had any problems with this camera. I love it!!!
- Fujifilm X-T223.6%
- Nikon D50025.4%
- Nikon AF-S 105mm F1.4E8.2%
- Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F47.5%
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-G857.2%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art6.7%
- Sigma 50-100mm F1.8 Art5.1%
- Sony a63006.4%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX10 III3.7%
- Sony Cyber-shot RX100 V6.3%
|Kingfisher by cjf2|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 11, K
|Bull Rider Being Launched by RBFresno|
from FX bodies and very high ISO