Sony Mavica FD-95 review
I have used my FD-95 since I first bought it. Not sure of the year, but it was soon after they first became available.
I LOVE this camera. Although it is a little bulky, I don't really mind because it LOOKS like a much more expensive camera (I paid just in excess of $2000, including taxes, here in Canada).
However even though by today's standards, it has a very low megapixel rating, I am able to take the most fabulous pictures with it.
You can see some of them at my photo website: pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bfstarling/my_photos
This camera gives me incredible pictures all the time....the macro setting has enabled me to see individual grains of pollen in flowers and the legs of a fly.
I think if the CD version of the camera had been available at the time I bought, I would have got one of those. But with a 64mb card and a disk carrier for the camera, it suits my purpose very, very well.
I have never had any problems with this camera. I love it!!!
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4