Sony 16-50 2.8 versus CZ 16-35 2.8

Started Mar 14, 2013 | Discussions thread
OP JimmyMelbourne Senior Member • Posts: 2,458
Re: Sony 16-50 2.8 versus CZ 16-35 2.8

This is what I am thinking too, and I will always have APS-C cameras around so I think the 16 50 is probably a good buy for now, I want to get the weather sealing and upgrade the tammy. In addition will compliment it with 70 400 II or 70 200 G instead.

I am still interested in knowing from those who might have both lenses and can let me know if the 16 50 comes close to the CZ in image quality.

Thanks for all you guys getting closer to being comfortable with my decision, just scared of spending so much hard earned cash and not being satisfied.

 JimmyMelbourne's gear list:JimmyMelbourne's gear list
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 Sony SLT-A77 Sony SLT-A37 NEX-5T Sony Alpha 7 +20 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow