Sony 16-50 2.8 versus CZ 16-35 2.8
I have narrowed down my choice to purchase one of these. The CZ to future proof moving to FF (no FF yet, but have 4 APS-C). Has anyone got both? Is the CZ worth the extra money and IQ? Or does the 16-50 perform close to the CZ?
I want to avoid having to upgrade yet again later (getting tired of buying and stepping up), but also mindful of my heavy use of APS-C right now.
|And I'm feeling all fingers and thumbs by Dutch Newchurch|
from Your City - Coffee Break
|Stitch that - macro by Beatsy|
from Household objects- Macro only
|Fiddling Around by garyjb|
from Concert musician playing
|wet red by George Veltchev|