Sony 16-50 2.8 versus CZ 16-35 2.8
I have narrowed down my choice to purchase one of these. The CZ to future proof moving to FF (no FF yet, but have 4 APS-C). Has anyone got both? Is the CZ worth the extra money and IQ? Or does the 16-50 perform close to the CZ?
I want to avoid having to upgrade yet again later (getting tired of buying and stepping up), but also mindful of my heavy use of APS-C right now.
|Quick by Fausto Zamparelli|
from An A to Z of Subjects- Week 17, Q
|Butterfly by sinigersky|
from Close up image without a macro lens