Canon's 18-55 is Under Rated

Started Mar 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
Woody W.
Woody W. Senior Member • Posts: 2,609
Quick clarificatio question

Do you mean the "18-55" (Non-stabilized) is underrated?

Or the "18-55 IS" (stabilized) is underrated?

The former was "OK", but nothing to write home about, by kit standards; but the latter is generally recognized as being a bit better optically - especially stopped down. I know my IS version has served me well until I got the 15-85 IS for Christmas.

-- hide signature --

- Woody -
Equipment: Enough. For now.
Quote: 'The only thing some people will believe is their own eyes. But in the realm of the quality of a printed image, is there really anything else that can be believed? '

 Woody W.'s gear list:Woody W.'s gear list
Canon EOS Rebel T6s Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM +1 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow