How good or bad is the E16-50PZ?

Started Mar 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
Flat view
Ralph46 Senior Member • Posts: 1,183
How good or bad is the E16-50PZ?

There is much apprehension about the quality of the 16-50PZ. Sorry, I can't compare with the 18-55, but the 16-50 is certainly more complex to give good results at the wide end. I think the enclosed photo should give a good idea of what it can do. It was taken at 16mm and is an only slightly compressed OOC jpeg taken with a NEX-6.Results become even better above 18-19mm so I don't see a point of comparing with the 18-55. The 18-55 couldn't have given you this shot.

Personally, I am a great fan of the 16-50 (also for the size). Perhaps I am biased, so your opinions would interest me.

Thanks for looking and perhaps for a comment.

-- hide signature --

- -Better a small camera in the pocket than a big one on the shelf --

 Ralph46's gear list:Ralph46's gear list
Canon PowerShot S95 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sony a6000 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS +4 more
Sony Alpha NEX-6
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow