To many Pixels is counter-productive!

Started Feb 27, 2013 | Discussions thread
MoreorLess Veteran Member • Posts: 4,340
Re: To many Pixels is counter-productive!

hjulenissen wrote:

There are (at least) two paths this discussion could take:

1. What are the theoretic limits for when you gain exactly nothing (or the gain is negative) by increasing sensel density for a given process technology. How does this "sweetspot" change as technology improves? Is there any fundamental limit?

2. What might my D800 have offered me in practical photography had they limited sensor density to 30MP or 24 MP, everything else equal?

In both cases, outside of the R&D labs of Canon, Nikon, Sony etc, it is hard to really know. We can speculate, apply theory and read papers on the subject. Or we can try to arrange semi-fair practical tests and try to learn from those. My impression is that a few forum members do that quite well, while most base their opinions on intuition. It can be hard to distinguish one from the other, but after a while you get to know the usernames.


In the case of the D800 I'd say we can get a pretty good idea from the D600 sensor, really the only disadvanatges of the D800 seem to be slower FPS and larger file sizes.

I think theres a clear difference between larger sensors and compact though, the former has always ensured theres a clear benefit from extra megapixels were as the latter has IMHO often used megapixels as a marketing gimmick.  The fact that compacts aimed at more serious users have not pushed megapixels as far dispite generally having larger sensors really is a bit of a giveaway.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow