D300s vs D7100 - is it about spec or is it about handling?

Started Feb 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
Mike H Contributing Member • Posts: 922
Upgrading for the sake of upgrading is a waste

of time (you have to learn the new camera) money (you could buy a heckofa lens with it)  more money (can your present computer handle those bigger files) My D300 cost me an additional 800 $ for the comp to run it and $120 for NX2
If your camera serves you well for the photography you do, What the hell do you need a new one for? To impress people? Thats a worthy way to do it lol.
In any case Nikon has not yet upgraded the D300.

I posted my sig line not long after joining this group with my D100 and everyone was all agog over the soon to be "new" D 200. Well I didnt move up until the 300 because that was a worthy up grade. Will my sig line ever say D400 that remains to be seen if it shows up.

Meanwhile Im going shooting

-- hide signature --

Im having too much fun with my D 300 to worry about what camera comes next

 Mike H's gear list:Mike H's gear list
Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM Nikon AF-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow