D7100's suitability as D300 replacement...

Started Feb 21, 2013 | Discussions thread
joeybob Contributing Member • Posts: 627
Re: D7100's suitability as D300 replacement...

azguy wrote:

There are too many differences: Limited buffer, no 10 pin connector, smaller body, limited buttons, scene modes, and more more. This is a camera targeting the advanced amateur, or serious enthusiast, not the pro using the DX format.

Couldn't agree more with this statement. Also, based on the D7100's pricing as well as the current pricing of refurbished D600 's I am doubting where a D400 could fit into the lineup.

Perhaps this is Nikon's way of saying "if you want pro build and full pro specs - buy pro level" and (for now at least) that is FX D800/D4.

 joeybob's gear list:joeybob's gear list
Nikon D200 Nikon D300 Nikon D3S Nikon D800 Nikon D600 +42 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow