Do you non professionals still use DSLR's? And why?

Started Feb 14, 2013 | Discussions thread
Hatstand Senior Member • Posts: 1,556
Re: Living in the past?

Donald Duck wrote:

The equivalent of dSLR? A system worth thousand of $$$?

Exactly my point: your definition of "quality" is completely different to mine, and I'm sure "quality" means a dozen different things again for other people.

What do pros do with their photos? Sell them to no-pros for a lot of money. So the non-pros deserve "pro IQ" after all, but it would be bizarre if they try to get that "pro IQ" by themselves?

You seem to be trying to twist my words to make a point, but I don't really know what that point is.

Non-pro's are free to decide what level of quality they find acceptable, and then choose equipment (and compromises) that meet their standards. They don't have to abide by other people's ideas of what is acceptable quality - only pro's need to do that, because otherwise their photos don't sell.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow