Why I switched to an OM-D Locked

Started Feb 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
Najinsky Veteran Member • Posts: 5,739
Re: Why I am NOT switching to an OM-D

zxaar wrote:

Najinsky wrote:

zxaar wrote:


idiotekniQues wrote:

in one picture. my old 40D and 17-55EF-S lens and the OM-D with a 12-35 on it. if only I also had the sigma 10-20, canon 100mm macro & 70-300IS to put next to my other MFT lenses.

You do realise that Q you linked to had no lens? The F/0 club is fun for a few days, but it gets a bit repetitive. I'd add a lens to it, if it was me.


Do you really believe even with lens attached you have any mft camera lens combo that is smaller and weighs less than Q with any of the lens?

No, but I now believe it's more than just a lens you're missing. I guess sense of humours weren't available in your mount.


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow