Why I switched to an OM-D Locked

Started Feb 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
thorkilry Contributing Member • Posts: 874
Re: Why I switched to an OM-D

qianp2k wrote:

Mjankor wrote:

My hunch is qianp2k is not familiar with recent m4/3,cameras and thinks they focus like live view on some DSLRs (slowly).

His tendency to post photos of various things as examples that m4/3s has trouble with is laughable. Having seen the work of many of the photographers who post to this forum I just end up shaking my head at the disconnect between what qianp2k thinks m4/3s can do, and what can really be achieved.

I am quite familiar with the development of mFT and mirrorless in general. I played E-M5 for a while in pdn PhotoPlus show along with NEX and G5, GH3, EOS-M...all major mirroless. E-M5 CDAF is fast no doubt but GH3 is a bit faster. However I still experienced noticeable lag of EVF refresh and slow down after initial few burst. CDAF still much lag behind against some surfaces that lacking of enough contrast or under reflection lights or under dim light, no mention fast moving subjects. In short still not at the levels of PDAF and OVF.

-- hide signature --

"However I still experienced noticeable lag of EVF."

If you were familiar with the E-M5, you would set the EVF to highframerate, no visible lag.


 thorkilry's gear list:thorkilry's gear list
Olympus C-765 UZ Olympus E-510 Olympus E-620 Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus OM-D E-M5 +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow