Why I switched to an OM-D Locked

Started Feb 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
zxaar Veteran Member • Posts: 4,246
Re: Why I am NOT switching to an OM-D

Greynerd wrote:

zxaar wrote:

Tell it to OP who seems to think that size and weight are everything.

mferencz wrote:

His point is that it's the sweet sport between maintaining high quality performance and size. Why stop with the Q in your example. If it's just about size, they make cameras the size of a postage stamp nowadays.

-- hide signature --

::> Knowledge is mother of efficiency.

He did not say size and weight is everything. He just said he is switching to an omd because of the size difference. After that everyone else's imagination took over.

and I also said that its not the smallest camera in market and nothing else.  Though this seems to hurt few OMD fanboys.

-- hide signature --

::> Knowledge is mother of efficiency.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow