14-24 or 24-70 ?

Started Feb 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
Windancer Veteran Member • Posts: 5,477
Re: 14-24 vs 24-70 ?

Istvan Lukacs wrote:

Too bad that Nikon don’t make a 17-55/2.8 FX lens, but I understand why.

I am thinking the 24-70/2.8 is that lens. I have both the Nikkor 17-55/2.8 that I use on my DX bodies (D300, D200 and D100) and the Nikkor 24-70/2.8 that I use on my D700. IMO the results seem to be indistuinguisable.

IMO the 24-70, as numerous people have mentioned, is a fine lens. I know I am very happy with mine, last year it replaced a Sigma 24-70/2.8 that I had used for 6 years.


Graham Fine Art Photography

Remember, it's not the CPU that's in your camera that makes great images, it's the one located about 4" behind the viewfinder that does.

Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended to impart a sense of humor. Given e-mail's inability to carry inflections, tone and facial expressions it may fail miserably in its intent. The sender acknowledges the limitations of the technology and assigns to the software in which this message was composed any ill feelings that may arise.

 Windancer's gear list:Windancer's gear list
Nikon D70 Nikon D100 Nikon D200 Nikon D300 Nikon D700 +21 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow