70-200 f4 VR tested on Photozone

Started Feb 2, 2013 | Discussions thread
jhinkey Senior Member • Posts: 2,813
Re: Why not a 100-400/4.5-5.6?

Shotcents wrote:

The 80-200, 70-200 VR1 and VRII were really all we needed. I only saw people asking for a slow 70-200 online.


When you are saying "we" to whom were you specifically referring to?  Because your "we" did not include me.  And were else besides online did you find people to talk to about wanting a f/4 70-200 or not?

I have the 80-200AFS and 70-200AFS VRII and I certainly wanted a slow, high IQ, excellent VR, great build 70-200/4.  In fact I bought one I wanted it so much . . . .

 jhinkey's gear list:jhinkey's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 Panasonic LX100 Nikon D800 Sony Alpha a7R II Panasonic G85 +27 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow