Fuji x100 vs micro four thirds ?

Started Jan 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
malabito
malabito Senior Member • Posts: 1,790
Re: Fuji x100 vs micro four thirds ?
1

Hi Marco I had the Fuji for quite some time and then got the omd. Sold the Fuji afterwards so no comparative shots to show, but from my experience the Fuji was definitely slower in shooting, focusing, response, much much slower. But even thou some people praise the omd for its quality to me the x100 images have some mojo that made them better then the results I am getting with the omd. it's not about high ISO, it's about the files, something about them that to me look better then the files of the Olympus.

I do like my omd, and its a much versatile system, faster, responsive,,etc. image quality is great, but I think is missing something. Don't know yet what it is, wish the x100 was as responsive as the omd. Some examples.

OMD

X100

-- hide signature --

Nikon 20mm 2.8, nikon 28mm 2.8 manual focus, Nikon 50mm 1.4, nikon 105mm 2.8 VR, nikon 70-200mm 2.8, sb-900, sb-800, SB-600, ...fuji x100, Leica M6
www.ailukewitsch.com
http://ailukewitsch.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/malabito

 malabito's gear list:malabito's gear list
Leica Q Leica M Typ 240 Leica Elmarit-M 28mm f/2.8 ASPH Leica APO-Summicron-M 75mm f/2 ASPH Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 2,8/21 ZM +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow