105mm f/2.8 Micro VR...Japanese model more desirable?

Started Jan 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
paulski66 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,213
Re: Yes, but here's why

AllOtherNamesTaken wrote:

Again, I don't believe one lens is actually better than another, but that doesn't matter because enough people think MIJ is superior that that you won't get as much for the MIC when you try selling it used.

Well if you don't believe this, and if you are actually buying the lens to take pictures with (rather than as some sort of obscure investment that you may or may not get your money out of at some indeterminate date in the future), then why would you

  1. Give up a 5-year warranty? and
  2. Take the risk that the used lens has defects/issues?

BTW: I have the MIJ version. Good to know I could sell it for a premium, I guess...

 paulski66's gear list:paulski66's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow