How many would choose stellar 50mm f/2 IS over a mediocre 50mm f/1.4/1.2?

Started Jan 20, 2013 | Discussions thread
akustykmagmanetpl Contributing Member • Posts: 764
and this proves what?

that 50/1.2 (or whatever that is) can produce pictures that even at cellphone screen size is not sharp...

vrooom... that's the sound of me heading off to a store to dump $1200+ to get this rather than spending $5 on an old M42 lens which does exactly the same. pardon... old Pentacons are probably a bit sharper...

I mean... honestly... this photo isn't sharp at all, and bokeh (which probably is fine with this lens) is tough to be judged (unsharp is not the same as bokeh). not to mention that the photo is pretty bad argument to justify the price of 50/1.2. seriously, I'd not spend this much money to make this kind of photos...

 akustykmagmanetpl's gear list:akustykmagmanetpl's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS Rebel T6i Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow