12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens

Started Jan 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
sigala1 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,818
Re: DxO vs ACR?

Bob Tullis wrote:

sigala1 wrote:

Bob Tullis wrote:

With a great deal of these body/lens combinations one MUST begin by insuring LaCA and LoCA are resolved for the finest resolution. But expecting premium DSLR glass results, especially at like apertures, is a little much (and even they can disappoint).

However, if one wants to eke a little more out of an exposure, especially with regard to peeping the corners, a trial of DXO Optics is worth checking out (check their site for your body/lens combinations first). I use it like a plug-in in a well established workflow (that is, you don't have to re-invent your workflow with it unless you want to).

What exactly does DxO do that ACR doesnt?

I don't know, haven't opened PS in ages, at this point. But I'm sure you've heard about it and its premise. If not. . .

I downloaded the free trial, but couldn't see that it did anything that ACR didn't, or maybe I just didn't understand all of the options.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow