12-35 unimpressive as a landscape lens

Started Jan 23, 2013 | Discussions thread
OniMirage Contributing Member • Posts: 990
Re: 12-35 impressive as a landscape lens

sgoldswo wrote:

OniMirage wrote:

I have not seen anyone speak of variance at all. But I have seen many owners simply roll over and accept the quality it puts out which even in reviews has been mentioned as not good enough for the price. I doubt the 12-60 will get a m4/3 version especially if Olympus is working on a fix for the phase detect lenses.

What?! Are you smoking something? The 12-35 a really great lens. It isn't perfect on Oly bodies thanks to the CA, but that's about it (and a non-issue for RAW shooters). On the GH3 it rocks.

Here we have someone using the lens on a 12-35 admitting its lack of quality and your telling me I am smoking something? When you compare the lens to standard lenses in optical quality your expecting something greater. But your not getting it and your paying more, for less.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow