85L II vs 135L vs 70-200L II

Started Jan 17, 2013 | Discussions thread
maiaibing Veteran Member • Posts: 4,510
Re: 85L II vs 135L vs 70-200L II

maiaibing wrote:

kevindar wrote:

I love the versatility of the 70-200. where as I found the 135L almost always too long indoors, I found the 70-200 quite useable indoor and outdoors. and shooting at 200, with the narrower field of view allows for less clutter in background. as for optical quality, there is nothing between them.

This is not true. The increased FL of 200mm does now - at all - compensate for the difference between the 135L f/2.0 and the zoom's f/2.8.

Damn, did not get a chance to edit this ... what I wanted to say was that you may get less clutter from the different framing but you will have more background clutter due to less blurring out of the background.

 maiaibing's gear list:maiaibing's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow