100-300 or 75-300?

Started Jan 20, 2013 | Questions thread
Kevdog Senior Member • Posts: 1,412
Re: 100-300 or 75-300?

mchnz wrote:

Bob Greenberg wrote:

I use the em5 and 100-300, its quite good on larger or static birds but hunts too much for bif. I also usw the Panny 35-100 which is a beautiful lens, focuses more accurately, but of course is shorter. Can't wait for someone to come out with a high quality longer lens, perhaps since Oly discontinued the 75-300 the replacement will be good!

Bird Nerd

If you're in no hurry, it might pay to wait a little and see if the 75-300 is really being replaced. It would make sense for Olympus to try and make one with lighter faster focusing elements. Hopefully with a more reasonable price (but I would guess not).

My guess is that it's the same lens in a MKII version with weather-sealing and probably not much other differences.

 Kevdog's gear list:Kevdog's gear list
Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 Olympus E-M1 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Panasonic Leica 100-400mm F4.0-6.3 ASPH
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow