Why no FF equiv. to EF-S 17-55/2.8?

Started Jan 11, 2013 | Discussions thread
David Naylor
OP David Naylor Contributing Member • Posts: 725
Re: On "aperture"

schmegg wrote:

Maybe your overthinking it? (no offence)

The 24-105 is great on FF - way better than it is on crop. I'm sure you wouldn't be too disappointed with it. I, like many others, have this lens mounted a lot of the time - it's an excellent walk-around lens. Remember that the 24-105 is only one stop slower than your 17-55, but you have a good two stops at image level - so you'll still be one stop better off.

Maybe I am overthinking it

Even so, when I finally do go fullframe (cause I'm sure it will happen one day) I will probably want to find a f/2.8 standard zoom of some kind.

 David Naylor's gear list:David Naylor's gear list
Canon EOS 600D Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
tko
MAC
MOD schmegg
MAC
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MAC
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MOD schmegg
MOD schmegg
MAC
MOD schmegg
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow