Steve Huff - X100S

Started Jan 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
(unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 13,144
Re: Steve Huff - X100S

Ryan Williams wrote:

nawknai wrote:

Photozopia wrote:

Considering the lengthy hatchet job he did on the original - mainly AF issues - only to recant when it proved an industry 'darling' amongst better, more renowned, reviewers - I'll pass on his opinions.

My (most recent) claim to fame is that the Huff banned me from his site when I suggested the X100 was far too complex a tool for his abilities ... and that it was he, not the camera, that failed to deliver the goods!

I wouldn't have a problem with Huff not liking the original X100 if he was a good reviewer, and even a decent photographer. He's just another guy on the internet with an opinion --- just like me, and just like you.

His opinion must resonate with quite a few people. Then again, same with Rockwell, and yet I don't see any reason to like him either.

That's exactly it. He's just a dude on the internet with a blog — any of us can do the same thing. That's why it's important to not read into what he says too much or get bent out of shape about it. It's the same as reading rattymouse's blog

Now there's an idea.....

-- hide signature --

DISCLAIMER: The text written herein is meant to provide the opinions and/or suggestions of the author. No statement herein is meant to be considered law of the land, representative of any party or group, and or a quote from any party or group. Neither is any statement in the contained text meant to be taken as scripture, doctrine, or all encompassing of an entire populous or any groups or individuals therein.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow