HS50 vs X-S1

Started Jan 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
Trevor G Veteran Member • Posts: 6,570
Re: HS50 vs X-S1

PAUL TILL wrote:

Rather soft at telephoto, especially wide open

  • Strong distortion across most of the range
  • Chromatic aberration at each end of the zoom (most pronounced at telephoto)
  • Slower autofocus than its peers

You aren't doing a fair evaluation by choosing an after-market, cheaper zoom.  It's not unusual for Nikon's or Canon's own offerings to be a little better.

However, most long reach in that end of the market, for quality imaging, is done with very expensive tele primes in the mega-thousand dollar market.

What the bridge cam market needs is a quality, constant aperture (around f2.8) lens, even if it only goes 20x or 25x, on a 2/3" sensor so you can shoot comfortably at ISO800. Or even ISO1600 in a few years time.

But there possibly is not all that much market for such a thing.

-- hide signature --

Trevor G
Silkypix tutorials at: http://photo.computerwyse.com

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow