new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?

Started Jan 7, 2013 | Discussions thread
ed rader Veteran Member • Posts: 8,301
Re: new Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 again? But now with weather sealing for sports?

For me it's all about the lenses and not about the camera. I've never regarded the 100-400 as an acceptable option being not cheap and not fast and not really lightweight and having a crazy design.

then you must not need a travel zoom for wildlife.  the lens weighs 3 lbs -- less than the 70-200L f2.8 II which is on your best list, and the "crazy design" makes the lens very compact and quick to zoom.

 ed rader's gear list:ed rader's gear list
Canon EOS 80D Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow