Portability v Quality are we obsessed by size?

Started Jan 10, 2013 | Discussions thread
GMussio Regular Member • Posts: 193
Re: Portability v Quality are we obsessed by size?

As far as image quality or high ISO quality go, the ILCs today are on par with the current APSC DLSR offerings.  You will never notice the difference between the two.  You really would have to make the jump to FF to notice a difference and even then its not much of a difference.  In some way, ILCs have better features then DSLRs.  Most can easily shoot video with continuous AF.  Most have amazing articulated screens.  Most now come with wifi and/or gps.  Most come with all the knobs and buttons you need, some even better laid out then a DSLR.  About the only thing amiss with ILCs is the AF.  No replacement for the mirror yet I'm afraid, but its not really all that bad.

The only reason why I dont pick up an ILC system is simple, lens selection blows.  Only m4/3 cameras have a decent offering and even then it does not rival the vast array of lenses you can get with a DSLR.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow