Seriously I would not waste my time. The chances of you making enough to cover the effort that's needed to keep feeding the agencies with stock they will take and can sell is very small.
I've pulled out of them all, there are those that keep feeding the monster and get a return, the vast majority get next to nothing back.
I bet the libraries make a fortune out of not paying anyone a penny for a lot of images. They have a minimum earn before they let you take your money. I would guess a large percentage never get that minimum or get fed up looking for it that they give up checking to see if it's there.
They are statistics they never publish.
I used to do well with libraries before they decided you can never sell to cheaply. Now I just sell direct, but that's a full time job targeting and marketing.
Give it a try for fun if you have a few spare hours and expect nothing much in financial reward back.
You most likely would do better selling images of the bands to the fans, either via ebay or your own site. You could link in with a lab to do the printing, handout the web address at gigs. That way you stand a chance of a worthwhile return if priced correctly.
The bands might even do a link on their site to yours for a cut.
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|Windswept juniper by Kreber|
from Wind power
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4