DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

17-40mm f/4L vs 16-35mm f/2.8L

Started Dec 26, 2012 | Questions thread
rebel99 Veteran Member • Posts: 4,025
Re: "from the test results i have read"

ed rader wrote:

that plus the fact that you haven't used the 16-35L II makes a solid case in your mind.

looks like you have used 16-35L II, now, would you please enlighten us how much better this lens is compared to 17-40 f4, and how so? comparison photos will be appreciated!

cheerz.

p.s.  Although not as fast as the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L lens, the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM Lens is a comparable lens in terms of image quality. The biggest difference between the 17-40 and the similar-focal-length-covering 16-35 L is price!

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow