DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

17-40mm f/4L vs 16-35mm f/2.8L

Started Dec 26, 2012 | Questions thread
jrarsenault Senior Member • Posts: 1,151
Re: 17-40mm f/4L vs 16-35mm f/2.8L

I would strongly suggest getting the Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8. I bought this lens for my 7D and it was my go-to workhorse lens for most of the time that I owned the 7D. If you plan to sell your 60D and head towards the full frame world or stay in crop land, I would get the 17-55 regardless. In the case that you do decide to venture into full frame territory, the 17-55 is an easy lens to sell.

A second suggestion would be the Canon EF-S 15-85 f/3.5-5.6. IMO it is a close second to the 17-55 closely matching it in sharpness and IQ. The major difference is its low light capability and focal length.

The 17-40 and 16-35 are fine lenses, however they wouldn't add much value over the 17-55 or 15-85 lenses other than build quality and a red ring. If you truly want a 'wide' lens, I would advise that you consider the Canon EF-S 10-22, Sigma 8-16, Sigma 10-20 or the Tokina 11-16. All are excellent lenses with several satisfied crop users.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow