Why NEX-7 over Fujifilm X-Pro1

Started Dec 13, 2012 | Discussions thread
Donkey914 Forum Member • Posts: 59
Re: I bought the NEX-7

SQLGuy wrote:

Clayton1985 wrote:

I agree and think it is slightly overpriced but keep in mind the Nikon 35mm doesn't have VR while the Sony does have OSS.

Which I did mention in my post. But, do you really think OSS should account for $200 to $250 more (i.e. more than double) in price?

-- hide signature --

Nex-7 with kit lenses, Contax G 35, and a number of legacy lenses (mostly Canon FD)

It tends to double the price of lenses it's attached to. This isn't unique to Sony - it's the same for Canon, Nikon and even Sigma (when the inevitably replace their lenses with IS equivalents).

$450 is still a lot for a consumer-level 35mm lens, but on the bright side, it's still more affordable than the $850 35/2 IS that Canon just put out.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow