My first Foveon camera (i'm impressed)

Paul Petersen wrote:

Tisk Tisk time to invoke the Kindergarten maxim "If you can't say anything nice don't say anything at all".

Pete
It's that approach that has lead to Sigma cameras being the underachievers they are.

It it's wrong, it should be mentioned.
 
Jaelkay wrote:
SigmaChrome wrote:

Yes. Stunning colour and detail. The DP2M really is an outstanding and surprising camera.
Yep. Especially for those of you who can live with (or are unable to see) false colour and detail
I would say that considering false details it is the best camera on the market
 
Jaelkay wrote:
victorgv wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:
SigmaChrome wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:

Well done, Dickie.

The first image is very, very sharp but the clouds have a strange coloured fringe around them.
No they don't.
They sure do.
They sure don't
Get your eyes checked. Get a decent display. Remove your Sigma bias.
I just wonder why you, we, all MUST look mostly for defects instead of appreciate what is good in a picture. We are not here to demonstrate that SIGMA camera are the best cameras in the market with no defects at all, but just to enjoy of what we have.

I guess that Nikonians, Canonians and others, do the same with their cameras they are just proud of the results they get. Why should not Sigmanian?

Please stop to fight and enjoy what the various technologies are capable to do nowadays at an affordable cost, knowing that you are free to choose the technology you prefer.

I choosed SIGMA because i like the Foveon concept and the semplicity of their products.


Have a nice day.
 
Doubleluca wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:
victorgv wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:
SigmaChrome wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:

Well done, Dickie.

The first image is very, very sharp but the clouds have a strange coloured fringe around them.
No they don't.
They sure do.
They sure don't
Get your eyes checked. Get a decent display. Remove your Sigma bias.
I just wonder why you, we, all MUST look mostly for defects instead of appreciate what is good in a picture. We are not here to demonstrate that SIGMA camera are the best cameras in the market
I own Sigma cameras and have done so since the SD9. I am still sick to death of the crap sky colours and the green and purple splotches in many of the photos coming from them.

The photo I commented on shows a sky of really Technicolor/Disney proportion and there is a fringing, lighter cloud formation around the main cloud body, which has a green and unhealthy tinge to it.

I don't have to look for defects from Sigma. They smack me right in the face.
 
Jaelkay wrote:
Doubleluca wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:
victorgv wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:
SigmaChrome wrote:
Jaelkay wrote:

Well done, Dickie.

The first image is very, very sharp but the clouds have a strange coloured fringe around them.
No they don't.
They sure do.
They sure don't
Get your eyes checked. Get a decent display. Remove your Sigma bias.
I just wonder why you, we, all MUST look mostly for defects instead of appreciate what is good in a picture. We are not here to demonstrate that SIGMA camera are the best cameras in the market
I own Sigma cameras and have done so since the SD9. I am still sick to death of the crap sky colours and the green and purple splotches in many of the photos coming from them.

The photo I commented on shows a sky of really Technicolor/Disney proportion and there is a fringing, lighter cloud formation around the main cloud body, which has a green and unhealthy tinge to it.

I don't have to look for defects from Sigma. They smack me right in the face.
My ??? would be then why do you still use them instead of one of the other offerings from others. If I had something that I was as disappointed as you sound with sigma I would get rid of it. I dont tolerate being slapped in the face.
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top