DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Sharper replacement for Tamron 18-270 (wide to mid range)?

Started Nov 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
ammac12 Regular Member • Posts: 248
Re: Sharper replacement for Tamron 18-270 (wide to mid range)?

amosf wrote:

Well, I went for the non-VC model as at the time there was a lot of talk that it had slightly better IQ, and I was mostly looking at moving subjects so I wasn't too worried about VC.

Since then I have seen a lot of people very happy with the VC model, some who had upgraded to it and found the IQ just as good or better, so now I'm starting to wonder if I would have been better off with the VC version.Not that I have had too many issues with what I have.

Without having the two myself I can't really comment on the comparison, but others seem happy with the VC lens.

I just got rid of my Tamron 18-270 and opted for the Tamron 17-50 non-VC.  I will be adding a Canon 70-200L f4 IS for my long range.  I don't think the VC is necessary when that close.  Plus, I tested the VC version and am not a fan of the "drop" adjustment when the stabilization engages - disengages.  It is the same with the 18-270 model.  I haven't spent time shooting with this new lens, but will today.  However, all the reviews remark on this lens's sharpness.  I will add that the AF is quick and much more silent than the 18-270.  IMO

At $499 PLUS a $75 mail in rebate, this lens fits your price point perfectly.  As for the VC vs. non-VC, how did photographers ever take such great shots before this technology arrived?  Save the $200 and put it towards more gear in the future.  : )

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow