DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Pro/Cons for Sigma 12-24 II & Canon 16-35 II

Started Nov 28, 2012 | Discussions thread
OP vvv14 Forum Member • Posts: 56
Re: What's wrong with the Canon 17-40?

BAK,

There's nothing wrong with 17-40: it's an excellent lens for its price. It's just that i'm looking for something better. I know 16-35 is better and I'm trying to find out if Sigma comes close to it or if the extra 4mm at the wide end are worth the other shortcomings. You might say that if it's quality i'm looking for, I should got for 17TS or a Zeiss, but those are out of my price range.

BAK wrote:

A 17-40 saves lots of money and works fine at f8.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow