Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?

Started Nov 23, 2012 | Discussions thread
Photato Senior Member • Posts: 2,360
Re: 16mpx is ideal for video. You couldn't be more wrong...

Joseph S Wisniewski wrote:

Again, your logic is flawed. Given equal levels of technology, more resolution directly equates to better image quality.

Seriously ?!

Here. -->

Canon C100 for  $6500 at B&H with a 8.3 MP sensor optimized for video.
The optimized pixel count allows the camera to avoid additive processing as a result of skipping lines during capture; sensor sensitivity is maintained and aliasing or other degradation of the image is prevented.

 Photato's gear list:Photato's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Canon EOS M Canon EOS M6 Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS +9 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow