D600 High ISO in DX

Started Nov 23, 2012 | Questions thread
Leo360 Senior Member • Posts: 1,141
Re: Clarkvision.com analysis

bobn2 wrote:

Leo360 wrote:

I cannot speak for Roger but I am NOT comparing across pixel sampling frequencies.

Yes you are, you might not think so, but by seeking to compare DR or SNT 'at the pixel level' that is exactly what you are doing.Pixel size determines sampling frequency which determines recorded bandwidth but not observed bandwidth.

No, I defer SNR and DR comparisons to after the re-sampling and do not compare them for naked pixels. And down-sampling done properly tends to increase the SNR by rejecting higher frequency noise. See below.

On the contrary, I am re-sampling the higher freq. image (think down-sampling) to a common sampling rate and then comparing at the same reference frequency. And down-sampling (when performed properly) tends to improve SNR.

Down sampling is unnecessary, all that is necessary is to observe the images the same size. For instance an A3 print is 18MP on a Canon 300 ppi printer. On an Epson 360 ppi printer it is 25MP. So if I took, for instance, a 1DX image I could print at A3 on a Canon without significantly resampling. I could do the same with a D600 on an Epson. If I compared the prints the noise would be substantially the same, without any resampling having happened, simply because it is the viewing size and the acuity of the viewers eye that determines the viewing bandwidth, so long as the output device pixels are below the limit of acuity.

-- hide signature --

Bob

I want to keep viewing acuity out of it because it is yet another low-pass filter and the problem is already complicated enough.

I want to compare signal and noise per sample (trying to avoid word pixel when sampling on both cameras is normalized to the same bandwidth (the same sampling rate). The sensor is the same size also. IIRC, this is what you proposed yourself in one of your earlier replies in this thread. If I know signal and noise properties of samples at a different sampling rate (different pixel pitch) AND I know the frequency response of theĀ  down-sampler I can calculate effective SNR and DR after re-sampling to a low common rate. This is standard technique in Multirate Signal Processing. Doing so establishes the same effective bandwidth for both images and allows to compare effective SNR per sample as in apples-to-apples. This method allows for an automatic ala DxOmark comparisons without bringing a human eye into the picture.

Leo

 Leo360's gear list:Leo360's gear list
Nikon D5100 Nikon D750 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm F4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
cpw
cpw
cpw
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow