Olympus 17 1.8 Review from Lenstip

Started Nov 20, 2012 | Discussions thread
eques Senior Member • Posts: 2,596
Re: Oh, please!!

Adventsam wrote:

eques wrote:

Adventsam wrote:

Maybe their camera body is faulty, all recent reviews seem to say m43 has poor iq?

Perhaps you should read their reviews, before you write such things.

They praised the Oly 75 highly, also the 60 and 45. So far to the recent reviews.

And at a time, when everyone on this forum and other reviews jubilated about the qualities of the 12 mm, their summary was divided between advantages and shortcomings of this lens. Well, now that the dust raised by the fan-boys has settled, the last opinions on this lens here on this forum were rather lacking this jubilation, as this 12 prime is optically not quite as good as the 12-35 zoom.

So, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese: first read, then think, finally write.


Oh pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeese, how can we take these guys seriously when the use the E-PL1? be nice to see it tested with a newer body, don't you think?

Photozone, being an equally serious review site, has now started to use the E-M5; but they also clearly show, which lenses are reviewed with which sensor, thus providing comparability.

So Lenstip does an excellent job for all mFT users.

Sad, you keep beating the messenger for the bad news, but I can understand your disappointment.


 eques's gear list:eques's gear list
Ricoh GR Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow