For Those Who Are Doubtful of a D300s Replacement

Started Nov 16, 2012 | Discussions thread
MOD TOF guy Forum Pro • Posts: 13,915
Re: If no D400/7100....


I don't think so, I think the D7000 was first visibility of an intentional merger. A new camera placed squarely between the D90 and D300s, with both of them officially continuing. Note that Nikon didn't leave room for a D90 successor in their new number scheme. While they have room for a D300s successor, I don't see one coming - otherwise the D7000 wouldn't have made a whole load of sense.

Seems plausible. IMO we'll know for sure by September 2013. The D300 line is definitely gone if the D400 is not out by then. Or maybe the D600 is its successor , at least price wise.

-- hide signature --


 TOF guy's gear list:TOF guy's gear list
Nikon D810 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED Sigma 150mm F2.8 EX DG OS Macro HSM +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow