nikon 80-200 f 2.8 or sigma 70-200 f2.8

Started Nov 15, 2012 | Questions thread
Windancer Veteran Member • Posts: 5,477
Re: nikon 80-200 f 2.8 or sigma 70-200 f2.8

Mac wrote:

I would probably lean towards a Sigma 70-200 that has HSM. I believe the HSM in the Sigma would allow you to get more winners.

I am not familiar with Sigma's naming conventions but if HSM is Sigma's version of VR personally IMO it is not really necessary in sports photography. I shoot a lot of sports ( and I turn off VR whenever I can. The reason being is the subject will be moving and will cause blur because VR tries to slow the shutter. If you are shooting static subjects in low light then I would get HSM or VR etc.


-- hide signature --

Graham Fine Art Photography
Remember, it's not the CPU that's in your camera that makes great images, it's the one located about 4" behind the viewfinder that does.
Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended to impart a sense of humor. Given e-mail's inability to carry inflections, tone and facial expressions it may fail miserably in its intent. The sender acknowledges the limitations of the technology and assigns to the software in which this message was composed any ill feelings that may arise.

 Windancer's gear list:Windancer's gear list
Nikon D70 Nikon D100 Nikon D200 Nikon D300 Nikon D700 +21 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow