Has digital camera development hit the wall?

Started Nov 12, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
(unknown member) Forum Pro • Posts: 13,144
Re: "Raw" is not really raw

Tom Caldwell wrote:

I think we agree that a raw file gives the ability to change/fix/tart-up the image that was captured at your leisure in PP software. Also that the raw file has the camera settings that are applicable embedded in it so that the PP software knows where to start with it's first-strike jpg example.

Therefore if the image that was captured merely used the straight-up core pixels of what the sensor saw without any in-camera jpg adjustments then the first-shot jpg in the PP software would not necessarily look like what you saw at capture time. It still could be manipulated but if the adjusted jpg that you caught was "pretty close" it would need much less work later.

Everybody is right but it is hardly surprising that we get confused. I still am.

-- hide signature --

Tom Caldwell

RAW IS RAW, period.  The fact that you might be looking at in-camera settings first does not change this fact.

-- hide signature --

DISCLAIMER: The text written herein is meant to provide the opinions and/or suggestions of the author. No statement herein is meant to be considered law of the land, representative of any party or group, and or a quote from any party or group. Neither is any statement in the contained text meant to be taken as scripture, doctrine, or all encompassing of an entire populous or any groups or individuals therein.

 rattymouse's gear list:rattymouse's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F10 Zoom Fujifilm FinePix F20 Zoom Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR Fujifilm FinePix X100 Fujifilm X10 +9 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow