Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)

Started Nov 2, 2012 | Discussions thread
Enir4 Senior Member • Posts: 2,453
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...

upsidedown wrote:

jpr2 wrote:

Is the fact that the 16-50 is being peddled as a kit lens can serve as an excuse? Don't we no longer remember excellent kit lenses from a yesteryear: Zuikos? Takumars? Rokkors? Hexanons?

sorry to jump into your discussion, just curious what $60 (in 1970 money) 24-70mm zooms you are referring above?

Why 1970? Why not 2005? Then you had the Sony R1 with an excellent Zeiss 24-120. More recently, Panasonic made a 14-45mm kit lens MUCH better than the 16-50. No need for software correction, good rendering, good sharpness sharpness.

In other words, it is possible to make a 1cm. long zoom lens. It's very compact, it's also horrible in IQ. There is a point in which IQ is too low, too many design compromises, brand X doesn't make it. In my opinion, the 16-50 falls in this category. Sony promised a G quality walkaround zoom for 2012, but didn't deliver. Hence the frustration.


 Enir4's gear list:Enir4's gear list
Sony RX1 Panasonic LX100 Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro Samyang 8mm F2.8 UMC Fisheye +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow