a surprising nikon 17-35/2.8 review by photozone

Started Oct 14, 2011 | Discussions thread
StillLearning Veteran Member • Posts: 4,170
Re: a surprising nikon 17-35/2.8 review by photozone

phototrope wrote:

And would add that the a 17-35 lens obviously beats the 14-24 for convenience. And that is the reason why I would join the line for an updated Nikon 17-35/2.8 *without* VR.

(Nikon released a patent for a 16-35/2.8 round about the same time as the patent for the 28/1.8. The latter, for me, totally redundant).

I will definitely be looking at the 16-35 2.8  when it appears.  For now I will stick with the 17-35 with my D800.



 StillLearning's gear list:StillLearning's gear list
Nikon D810 Nikon D750 Nikon D7200 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +9 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow