Canon. 100-400 L. good, bad or mediocre?

Started Oct 29, 2012 | Discussions thread
Kevin Jorgensen Contributing Member • Posts: 745
Re: Canon. 100-400 L. good, bad or mediocre?

I have 4 L zooms covering 16 to 560 if I add the 1.4 II extender. I just love the focal length of the 100-400, its my most used lens, I also have 6 primes. But gee you read some funny posts on it. Too heavy, sucks dust, bad copies, not as good as this, not as good as that, blah blah blah! I'm no pro but Romy Ocon is, go take a look at his work with the 100-400. I've had mine over a year, its not too heavy......for me, is as sharp as my 70-200f4L IS from 100-200 and as far as I can tell, doesn't suck dust. Maybe its me who's got the bad copy!

 Kevin Jorgensen's gear list:Kevin Jorgensen's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Samyang 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow