70-200 f4: replacement for f2.8 or addition?
Agree, 2.8 is 2.8 as another poster said. Though the 300 F4 is in many a sports photographer's bag and I suspect the 70-299 F4 will be too.
Not all operate in big arenas where the separation of 2.8 is all but mandatory.
I really doubt many 300 f/2.8 owners bought it for the additional DOF primarily. With me is was that it can operate in half the light of the f/4 model. Moreover, it can handle converters in dimmer light which really makes a difference.
Prior the the new f/8 sensors, there was an issue trying to AF at higher than f/5.6. The 300 f/4 then was mostly limited to a 1.4 converter while the 300 f/2.8 could use any converter. Double the light and converter use got the big bucks out of me; not DOF.
Follow me on Twitter @craighardingsr : Equipment in Profile
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Oct 27, 2012|
|Oct 27, 2012||1|
|Oct 28, 2012|
|Oct 28, 2012|
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%