WOW, K5II-s vs a99 base iso raw-

Started Oct 24, 2012 | Discussions thread
viking79 Forum Pro • Posts: 14,147
Re: WOW, K5II-s vs a99 base iso raw-

Maxeyesore wrote:

So this is from a sony thread that has been trying to bash the D600 in favor of the a99. I popped in to suggest a base iso comparison with the II-s and a99, and was met with a tidal wave of hate and insults. Either way, I managed to escape with my life and a little raw file here.

Trolling generally ends that way  The NEX 5n also has a very weak or even no AA filter and same sensor as K-5 so might be a better comparison at the pixel level.

I said it there so I'll say it here, I am expecting the II-s to outresolve the $2800 a99 at lower iso, of course falling off at higher stops as FF is simply FF. Tell us what you think.

Looking at the resolution here, the left image cuts out around 70 to 75 and the right around 85, so the right image is a lot higher resolution on the chart.  The left image shows heavy moire starting around 85 as well, while the right image has some artifacts, it lacks the distinct color moire shown in the left image.

Find two images that are focused the same


-- hide signature --

I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: (updated daily)

 viking79's gear list:viking79's gear list
Sony Alpha a7R Samsung NX1 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 85mm F1.4 ED SSA Samsung NX 60mm F2.8 Macro ED OIS SSA +5 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow