Nex 6: sufficient quality to trump any need for the RX-1?

Started Oct 11, 2012 | Discussions thread
Joes Raw Talk
OP Joes Raw Talk Forum Member • Posts: 68
Re: Nex 6: sufficient quality to trump any need for the RX-1?

Joes Raw Talk wrote:

Presuming the same image quality of the 5n, I am pressed to say I would spend $2,799 for the RX-1, for almost whatever image quality edge that it may have. Perhaps I can be swayed towards the RX-1 if/when the image metrics are known and fair comparisons possible between the two show readily a gap in quality. I admit that I have a bit of skepticism. That's not to say that RX-1 will have better IQ, but that it is SO much better than the 6 that I want or need it.

What makes me think this is looking at the sample shots that are now rolling out with the RX-1 and Nex 6. I look at them and think; unless I had some substantive reason to do so, the Nex-6 accomplishes near all I need, save for a really shallow depth of field if that's your thing.


-- hide signature --


To those who opted to vote 'thumbs down', what, I didn't write it in a simpleton fashion so you could get your limited intellect to comprehend what I was saying?

I have really, no, Really come to hate DPR forums. I am done with forum participation until they dump the idiot icon that appeals to approximately 1/3 of the users here.

You can end this string or expend some effort providing some smarta** retort but it will fall on deaf ears because I'm moving on.

Enjoy this virtual playpen filled with toddler minds.

 Joes Raw Talk's gear list:Joes Raw Talk's gear list
Nikon Coolpix 5000 Canon PowerShot S90 Canon PowerShot G11 Canon PowerShot G12 Canon EOS 5D Mark II +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow