Macro lens, IS or non-IS?

Started Oct 8, 2012 | Discussions thread
offshore13 Regular Member • Posts: 124
Re: Macro lens, IS or non-IS?

danhowes wrote:


I'm looking to get into macro photography and currently comparing the 100mm L or 100mm non-L to go onto my 7D.

The macro photography I will be doing will be mostly on nature walks and almost all hand-held.

My question is the IS on the L-version going to make much difference on this sort of photography (I'm aware it makes a lot of difference with telephoto pictures) over the non IS version, worth the extra £250?


Exactly the same predicament I went through 3 months ago.  I went IS.  Our only difference is your 19 AF points vs. my 9 pt AF points.  It was my first red ring.  Amazingly sharp. Satisfied at the moment.

 offshore13's gear list:offshore13's gear list
Canon PowerShot A460 Canon EOS 60D Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM +4 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow