Is Micro 4/3's Going To make DSLRs obsolete?

Started Oct 8, 2012 | Discussions thread
jayrandomer Contributing Member • Posts: 819
Bigger is better, smaller is better

I think that large sensors will always be used by the portion of people who want the very best resolution and image quality that they can get.  No matter what the sensor technology, 35mm will always hold a quality advantage over u4/3 (whether or not there is a mirror box), so some small portion of the population will choose to lug around heavy gear.  And since bigger sensors mean bigger lenses, mirror or not, size reductions may come but they won't be staggering.

And while u4/3 is squeezing APS-C and FF from below, cell phone cameras get better and better, in some sense squeezing u4/3 from below.  I suspect that in the future you'll have a phone with good-enough-for-most-things quality and a few crazy people will haul out their SLRs  (or mirrorless FF) and gigantic lenses.

What I'd be really interested to see is some breakthrough that allows for economic production of really large sensors.  I don't think printing technology is up to the task yet, but it's possible that in future it could be.  Imagine the possibilities with sensors of essentially arbitrary size.  I hope it happens in my lifetime.

 jayrandomer's gear list:jayrandomer's gear list
Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 6D Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow